TL;DR: the Bible and the Communist Manifesto are equally clear: the state is god, and property, except for that of the chosen ruling class, must be abolished. To skip the foreplay and see direct comparisons, go to “Down to Brass Tacks: Biblical Communism.”
Biblical Christianity is a Communist/Zionist psyop and is ruining the world the same way Communism is, by getting believers to accept and allow — and even desire — the arrival of the new world order, so-called, so their savior will come.
While many Christians themselves do good things, espouse honorable and logical ethics, believing in property (to some degree at least, save participation in violent politics) this is in spite of, and not because of, their (un)holy book.
The schizophrenic Bible, like the schizophrenic Communist Manifesto, does not support private property. It prescribes the utter abolition and outright theft of private property, slavery to a ruling class, and destruction of any and all who stand in the way. Just as the Communist Manifesto prescribes the brutal warpath of the Proletariat.
I would have thought I was crazy for suggesting this just a year or two ago, but reality is reality, and here I am. It’s all right in our faces, from the Zionist character called Moses, to the Communist Karl Marx (Karl Levi), the descendant of a line of Jewish rabbis. It’s further no secret that, for whatever reason, Bolshevism was a largely Judaistic endeavor, as recorded by the historical record and those that were present for the Russian revolution. This is not to suggest that any one biological lineage is somehow not good in and of itself, but that Zionism (the ideology of Judaism) has played a major part in shaping the evils of the modern world). And whatever Karl Levi’s (Marx) views on his forbears’ religion may have been, he all the same fought for his own “Zion” — a brutal Communist dystopia ravaging and destroying the lives and wealth of all but a select few, brought about by way of murderous tribal takeover. It’s ruling the world even (and especially) today.
For those that may think I am crazy, I urge you to read the whole article with an open yet critical mind, and focus rebuttals on what the actual documents say themselves, and not just what you believe personally. I write this because the most pernicious, and most insidious place to hide an evil ideology is right in the camp of its supposed opposition. That way, it will never be destroyed as long as the cover is not blown.
Introduction: Two Manifestos, One Deception
The Communist Manifesto, published in February 1848, is rightly known by most freedom-loving individuals as a shining exercise in malevolent lunacy — an evil prescription for the downfall of civilized society. But the Christian Bible isn’t typically viewed this way, though the two aren’t so different. In fact, it’s accurate to say they are cut from the same exact Commie cloth.
The Manifesto is venerated by Marxist thinkers as if it were their own “red” Bible. There’s no real rhyme or reason to Marx and Engels’ self-detonating prescriptions, other than the underlying (and yet explicit), disguised (and yet openly stated) desire to tyrannically control and oppress all other humans, and literally rule the world in the name of saving it for a downtrodden class — not at all dissimilar to the Bible’s violently property-divesting, starvation-inducing, tribal mass murder of anyone and everyone (violent or not) who is standing in the way of the so-called “promised land,” reserved for the supposedly ever-persecuted Israelites.
In Marxist terms, the promised land is the “means of production.”
Even the Jesus of the Bible, who demanded in no uncertain terms that his followers forfeit their possessions as a strict condition of following him, and whose words often don’t make sense outside of the revolutionary context of first century Judea, wished to vest power from the Roman state, and acknowledged that “the violent take it by force.” This acknowledgment is sometimes interpreted to mean that the so-called kingdom of heaven is passively being beaten up and hurt by invaders, but that doesn’t seem to hold up with cross-reference.
The Bible attests to the revolutionary atmosphere of the era on myriad occasions, noting that Simon was a “Zealot” (a first century, militant anti-Roman group), and depicting the Christ figure advising the purchase of swords, saying he did not come to bring peace, and teaching parables about murdering his opposition. He also told his contemporaries that some of them would not even die before he came into power.
But, like with the Communist Manifesto, there are many contradictions, discrepancies and possible interpretations which can keep the arguments and speculation going for hours. Christians might protest that Christ never meant to be an earthly revolutionary, because he said “my kingdom is not of this world.” But this is much the same kind of confusion as Marx criticizing the despotism of capitalist rulers against the poor, yet still prescribing despotism and violence to set things right. It is like the Jewish God saying “Thou Shalt Not Kill,” then commanding killing, and the Jesus character advising to “resist not evil,” and “love thine enemy,” while all the while cursing the Pharisees, whipping them, and supporting 100% the God called Yahweh which destroyed even peaceful people and infants in the Old Testament.
Comparing Jesus with historical anti-Roman figures at the time might shed even more light on the issue.
Finally, complete Zionist control of the “means of production” is the New Jerusalem according to the direct statements of the Christian Bible itself: A one-world government of “chosen people” exercising full dominance of the heathen Gentiles (read: Bourgeoisie). Many Christians believe they will be reigning with Christ in this city, but that’s not really what the Bible says if read carefully. I’ll get to that in the final section.
The Bible says, you’re to literally lick the dust of the feet of your Zionist masters, obey any and every state official, and, in true Klaus Schwab-ian style, own nothing — and be happy.
Again, putting forth two completely contradictory viewpoints (intentional “control by confusion/chaos” in my view) as both documents do over and over, does not rescue any writing from the reality of being thusly nonsensical.
Just see how Marx, in Section I of the Manifesto, first denigrates the centralization of state power:
“The bourgeoisie … has agglomerated population, centralised the means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands.”
But continues, with no sense of irony:
“The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest, by degree, all capital from the bourgeoisie, to centralise all instruments of production in the hands of the State, i.e., of the proletariat organised as the ruling class.”
In essence, the manifesto claims that violent, dominance-based class antagonism is the problem, and that only violent, dominance-based class antagonism can fix it.
The Bible similarly states that killing and stealing are wrong, and that only killing and stealing can fix this problem. That usury and slavery are not acceptable, unless they are perpetrated on non-Jews.
Down to Brass Tacks: Biblical Communism
While various Western cultures that have grown up surrounding Christianity embrace (to some degree) individual rights, property, and generally honorable practical ethics (though most still participate in statism/politics, which is the antithesis of morality), scrutinizing the texts themselves, on which the Christian religion is based, reveals that Judaism and Christianity have much more in common with Marx and Engels’ Communist Manifesto, than with libertarianism, Western ideals, or even the “Golden Rule” itself.
Rather than bore you with more long paragraphs here, I’ll put forth some key goals that both Communism and Christianity share, and lead up to the finale, a comparison of the Biblical definition of its “New Jerusalem” to the Marx and Engelsian ideal of a Communist one-world (dis)order:
Point 1: Anti-Property, Centralized Distribution of Food/Goods
Communist Manifesto:
“In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.”
-Section II
“We have seen above, that the first step in the revolution by the working class is to raise the proletariat to the position of ruling class to win the battle of democracy … Of course, in the beginning, this cannot be effected except by means of despotic inroads on the rights of property…”
-Section II
There must be “Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly”
–The Principles of Communism, by Engels
There must be “Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.”
-Section II
Bible:
“When you march up to attack a city, make its people an offer of peace. If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labor and shall work for you. If they refuse to make peace and they engage you in battle, lay siege to that city. When the Lord your God delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the men in it. As for the women, the children, the livestock and everything else in the city, you may take these as plunder for yourselves. And you may use the plunder the Lord your God gives you from your enemies. This is how you are to treat all the cities that are at a distance from you and do not belong to the nations nearby.”
(Christians often argue that the Old Testament’s rape and genocide and pedophilic pillage of certain cities had to be committed to keep the Israelites from serving these cities’ “false gods.” Here we see that the true goal was plunder of property and brutal pillage. The cities discussed in this passage are differentiated from the ones serving false gods in the verse directly following the one cited. So the defense that all the murder was to prevent the people from serving other gods is here refuted by the Bible itself. Note that even those cities that try to make peace are enslaved, forced to labor for the Zionists (doesn’t get any more Commie than that), and their children are literally referred to as “plunder” to be “used.”)
-Deuteronomy 12:10-15
“When the Lord your God brings you into the land he swore to your fathers, to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, to give you—a land with large, flourishing cities you did not build, houses filled with all kinds of good things you did not provide, wells you did not dig, and vineyards and olive groves you did not plant…“
-Deuteronomy 6:10-12
“But ye shall be named the Priests of the LORD: men shall call you the Ministers of our God: ye shall eat the riches of the Gentiles, and in their glory shall ye boast yourselves.”
(This narrative is carried all the way through to the final book of the Christian Bible, nullifying protests that Jesus changed everything and Jews and Gentiles will be equal — but more on that at the end of this article.)
-Isaiah 61:6
“So likewise, whosoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot be my disciple.”
-Luke 14:33, (Jesus addressing the crowd)
“Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold, and laid them down at the apostles’ feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.” (Click the hyperlink to see the direct Communist connection here)
-Acts 4: 34,35
But a certain man named Ananias, with Sapphira his wife, sold a possession, And kept back part of the price, his wife also being privy to it, and brought a certain part, and laid it at the apostles’ feet. But Peter said, Ananias, why hath Satan filled thine heart to lie to the Holy Ghost, and to keep back part of the price of the land? Whiles it remained, was it not thine own? and after it was sold, was it not in thine own power? why hast thou conceived this thing in thine heart? thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God. And Ananias hearing these words fell down, and gave up the ghost: and great fear came on all them that heard these things.
-Acts 5: 1-5
And in those days, when the number of the disciples was multiplied, there arose a murmuring of the Grecians against the Hebrews, because their widows were neglected in the daily ministration. (I thought there was no one who lacked?) Then the twelve called the multitude of the disciples unto them, and said, It is not reason that we should leave the word of God, and serve tables. Wherefore, brethren, look ye out among you seven men of honest report, full of the Holy Ghost and wisdom, whom we may appoint over this business.
(As if serving tables is some kind of low-level job, and their ideology is of prime importance. Compare this to the starvation and lack of adequate distribution in Communist regimes across history while the ideology continues to be incessantly promulgated. Different in degree, but not really in the essence of the problem: centralized distribution).
-Acts 6: 1-3
CONCLUSION: According to the Bible’s own words and examples, as with Marxist Communism, there is no middle ground when it comes to surrendering property to the church/state. Jesus stated explicitly one could not be a disciple/his follower without doing it, and the early church did just that, according to the Bible itself. The Bible also consistently states, from Old Testament to New, that the Zionist class will take complete power and exercise complete control over the entire world, pillaging and stealing all property of others, peaceful or otherwise.
Point 2: One-World Government, False ‘Peace,’ Abolition of Nations and the Private Individual
Communist Manifesto:
“In proportion as the exploitation of one individual by another will also be put an end to, the exploitation of one nation by another will also be put an end to. In proportion as the antagonism between classes within the nation vanishes, the hostility of one nation to another will come to an end.”
-Section II
Bible:
“The LORD will mediate between nations and will settle international disputes. They will hammer their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks. Nation will no longer fight against nation, nor train for war anymore.”
Communist Manifesto:
“The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.”
-Section IV
Bible:
“And I will overthrow the throne of kingdoms, and I will destroy the strength of the kingdoms of the heathen (Gentiles); and I will overthrow the chariots, and those that ride in them; and the horses and their riders shall come down, every one by the sword of his brother.”
(Interesting that every single rigged, Zionist banker’s war pits innocent poor people against their brothers — humans they’ve got nothing against personally.)
-Haggai 2:22
Communist Manifesto:
“You must, therefore, confess that by ‘individual’ you mean no other person than the bourgeois, than the middle-class owner of property. This person must, indeed, be swept out of the way, and made impossible.”
-Section II
Bible:
“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.”
-Galatians 3:28
(This sounds nice and pretty until the author elsewhere props up the Jew as being superior to unnatural Gentiles, and Peter commands slaves to serve abusive masters. It doesn’t get much more Commie than the Orwellian: WE ARE ALL EQUAL, BUT SOME ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS.)
Communist Manifesto:
“The nationalities of the peoples associating themselves in accordance with the principle of community will be compelled to mingle with each other as a result of this association and thereby to dissolve themselves, just as the various estate and class distinctions must disappear through the abolition of their basis, private property.”
-Draft of a Communist Confession of Faith
“It follows that the communist revolution will not merely be a national phenomenon but must take place simultaneously in all civilized countries – that is to say, at least in England, America, France, and Germany … It is a universal revolution and will, accordingly, have a universal range”
–Draft of a Communist Confession of Faith
CONCLUSION: In both Christianity and Communism, the whole world is to be united under one system, where there is ostensibly no class difference. However, there is a totalitarian ruler in both cases, as evidenced not only by the texts, but by Communism and Biblical religion in practice. (Pol Pot didn’t work the fields and starve in Cambodia. He ate the finest foods. The Zionist tribe still forbids mixing with other groups of people for themselves, but forced mixing is the order of the day for the Gentiles, even now. Of course, voluntaryism is against both forced integration and forced disassociation, issues which the absurd anti-concepts of state “borders” and “public property” create.)
Point 3: Hatred of the Family, Acceptance of Abuse for the ‘Greater Good,’ Complete Blind Subservience to the State
Bible:
“Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God.”
-Romans 13:1
“Put them in mind to be subject to principalities and powers, to obey magistrates, to be ready to every good work…”
-Titus 3:1
“Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also as a matter of conscience.”
-Romans 13:5
“This is also why you pay taxes, for the authorities are God’s servants, who give their full time to governing.”
-Romans 13:6
“He replied, ‘Collect no more taxes than the government requires.’”
(Jesus telling officials how to collect taxes)
-Luke 3:12
Communist Manifesto:
-Section II
Bible:
“But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also.”
-Matthew 5:39 (A Commie’s wet dream)
“And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well.”
-Matthew 5:40
Communist Manifesto:
“On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution. The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.”
-Section II
Bible:
“If anyone comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters—yes, even their own life—such a person cannot be my disciple.”
-Luke 14:26
“And another of his disciples said unto him, Lord, suffer me first to go and bury my father. But Jesus said unto him, Follow me; and let the dead bury their dead.”
-Matthew 8:21,22
“But love your enemies, do good to them, and lend to them without expecting to get anything back. Then your reward will be great, and you will be children of the Most High, because he is kind to the ungrateful and wicked.”
(Really think about this. Where does it lead? Does anyone Christian really do this consistently, or hate their family, or sell all they have? The answer is no, almost none. They don’t even follow their own book thankfully, because this would lead, and indeed does lead to the degree that some adopt this mentality, to pure destruction and oppression. It is an insane admonition.)
-Luke 6:35
CONCLUSION: Both Communism and the Bible promise rewards to the obedient “Proletarians” who obey thoughtlessly and suffer complete loss of identity and property and family for the ‘greater good’ and a reward to come later in some non-existent pipe dream paradise. It should be noted that Jesus himself was well-received and well fed and drunk and had many followers and supporters and places to stay in the Bible’s telling of things. Connections, in other words. He was proud enough to call non-Jews “dogs” and directly claim that he came only for the Israelites.
Final Section: The New Jerusalem Is Eternal Slave Labor for the Self-Proclaimed ‘Chosen’ Class
“Construction, on public lands, of great palaces as communal dwellings for associated groups”
-Draft of a Communist Confession of Faith, (ix)
“In My Father’s house are many mansions; if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.”
-John 14:2
This will be a short section. I am getting tired, and the parallels are so numerous — too numerous to list them all. I didn’t even get to cover androgyny and eunuchs and circumcision and etc., etc. Anyway. The final point.
The City of Zion/New Jerusalem narrative that extends from the Old Testament book of Isaiah in the Bible, to the New Testament finale of Revelation, consistently notes that the Zionist Jews will be the ruling class. After billions of Gentiles are wiped off of the face of the earth, the remaining ones will become slaves. There will only be one religion. The Communist Manifesto notes that once global Communism is achieved, all religions other than the Communist view will similarly cease. But let me draw this clear, supremacist line with a few verses, and then close this out.
Describing Zion:
“Thus saith the Lord GOD, Behold, I will lift up mine hand to the Gentiles, and set up my standard to the people: and they shall bring thy sons in their arms, and thy daughters shall be carried upon their shoulders. And kings shall be thy nursing fathers, and their queens thy nursing mothers: they shall bow down to thee with their face toward the earth, and lick up the dust of thy feet; and thou shalt know that I am the LORD”
-Isaiah 49:22,23
“Arise, shine; for thy light is come, and the glory of the LORD is risen upon thee. For, behold, the darkness shall cover the earth, and gross darkness the people: but the LORD shall arise upon thee, and his glory shall be seen upon thee. And the Gentiles shall come to thy light, and kings to the brightness of thy rising.“
-Isaiah 60:1-3
And the sons of strangers shall build up thy walls, and their kings shall minister unto thee: for in my wrath I smote thee, but in my favour have I had mercy on thee. Therefore thy gates shall be open continually; they shall not be shut day nor night; that men may bring unto thee the forces of the Gentiles, and that their kings may be brought. For the nation and kingdom that will not serve thee shall perish; yea, those nations shall be utterly wasted.
Isaiah 60: 10-12
“Thou shalt also suck the milk of the Gentiles, and shalt suck the breast of kings: and thou shalt know that I the LORD am thy Saviour and thy Redeemer, the mighty One of Jacob.”
-Isaiah 60:16
“The sun shall no longer be your light by day, Nor for brightness shall the moon give light to you; But the LORD will be to you an everlasting light, And your God your glory.”
-Isaiah 60:19
“And strangers shall stand and feed your flocks, and the sons of the alien shall be your plowmen and your vinedressers. But ye shall be named the Priests of the LORD: men shall call you the Ministers of our God: ye shall eat the riches of the Gentiles, and in their glory shall ye boast yourselves.“
-Isaiah 61:5,6
(NOTE: The traditional Christian narrative is that all those “unsaved” by Christ will die in the end. But here we have slave Gentiles differentiated from those murdered by God. Remember the word “glory” for later.)
“For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind.”
-Isaiah 65: 17
Now let’s go to the New Testament where the Gentiles are supposed to be (according to mainstream Christianity) celebrating in this same New Jerusalem:
“And the city had no need of the sun, neither of the moon, to shine in it: for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof. And the nations of them which are saved shall walk in the light of it: and the kings of the earth do bring their glory and honour into it. And the gates of it shall not be shut at all by day: for there shall be no night there. And they shall bring the glory and honour of the nations [Gentiles] into it.”
Revelation 21:23-26
(It says it in a more polite, disguised way here. But remember why they are bringing their “glory” and riches into it.)
…….
The Communist Manifesto is a work whose ideas being put into practice has resulted in the death of untold millions of human beings. Whether one assumes the Bible is true or not, the same is true for the Jewish cult’s ideas. Whether the Hebrews really did commit infanticide and genocide regularly as the Bible shamelessly maintains they did, we’ve got the Crusades, the Inquisition, the countless lives shattered and ripped to unrecognizable shreds by guilt and shame and self-hatred from a shizophrenic religion which at once claims “Thou Shalt Not Kill” but simultaneously lauds slaughtering infants and pedophilia as the only way to attain the “Promised Land.” It’s a tribal myth, the product of malice or mental illness or both, in both Marx and Moses’ case. Support for almost every major war in modern times is garnered through leveraging Abrahamic religions and playing on the feelings of adherents. Just look at Netanyahu whipping the Christians into a frenzy now to kill Palestinians by calling them “Amalekites.” Look at the supposed justifications for the Iraq War. Look how many died. And why? Zionism decides policy in America.
Both the Communist Manifesto and the Bible are often oversimplified and misunderstood by their more knee-jerk critics. Self-labeled conservatives who respond to Communism in a merely reactionary way, do a tremendous injustice to proper understanding and apt refutation of this insidiously, psychopathic ideology. In the same way, those who attempt to lambast the Bible with no historical or contextual understanding only lambast themselves, and end up through their foolish examples lending creedence to the tribal Jewish lie. These knee-jerk reactions create an easy caricature for opponents to attack, and open the door for yet more confusion to enter. There are very true observations and very real nuggets of wisdom in both. But a little bit of poison in your water is a full-on death sentence. As Paul said: Your glorying is not good. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump?
Voluntary Japan 
Leave a comment